Initial check in.
This commit is contained in:
29
TODO
Normal file
29
TODO
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
|
||||
- Fix memory leak. Proof.cleanup doesn't seem to work...
|
||||
- Add automated proof support. This can probably be done in a series
|
||||
of stages:
|
||||
1) Create a semi-automated prover that applies rules when it can
|
||||
and seeks user input when it has to (inherit from UserRuleSource).
|
||||
2) Progressively refine the rule heuristic until the
|
||||
semi-automated prover no longer needs human input.
|
||||
3) Rigorously test.
|
||||
4) Convert to pure automated prover.
|
||||
- Finish commenting.
|
||||
|
||||
- Implement auto-prover strategy
|
||||
1 ) goal is to get all formulas on the lhs with the form VAR or ~VAR
|
||||
2 ) if rhs is VAR and rhs != any lhs(i) --> notR
|
||||
2a) if rhs is VAR = some lhs(i) --> hyp
|
||||
3 ) if rhs is & --> andR
|
||||
4 ) if rhs is ~X --> notR
|
||||
5 ) if rhs is ==> --> impR
|
||||
6 ) if rhs is X|~X or ~X|X --> magic
|
||||
7 ) if rhs is X|Y and lhs contains only ~(W|Z)'s, VAR's, and ~VAR's
|
||||
--> orR1, then orR2 if necessary
|
||||
8 ) if rhs is X|Y and lhs not described by 7's condition --> notR
|
||||
8 ) if rhs is constant (i.e. false)...
|
||||
8a) if lhs contains non-basic formulae only of form ~(X|Y) --> notL
|
||||
8b) if lhs contains X&Y --> andL
|
||||
8c) if lhs contains p and ~p --> notL on ~p
|
||||
8d) if lhs contains ~X where X is non-basic, non-OR --> notL
|
||||
8e) if lhs contains X==>Y, impL
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user